Considering Algeria which belongs to AL (League of Arab States), AU (African Union), and OIC (Organisation of the Islamic Conference), there were various issues that were raised. They included justice, international instruments, freedom of opinion and expression, women’s rights, death penalty, disability rights, CP rights and Statelessness, and the right to a nationality.

There were various recommended state regional groups, Western European and other states group at 29.5%, African group at 27.9%, Asian group at 17.2%, Group of Latin American & Caribbean States at 16.4%, eastern European group at 8.2%, and observers at 0.8%.

Table 1: Recommending state regional group

Morocco is an African state belonging to AL (League of Arab States), AU (African Union), and OIC (Organisation of the Islamic Conference). Most of the issues that stood out were women’s rights, child rights, human rights to education and training, disability rights, detention, indigenous people and Statelessness, and the right to a nationality.

There were various recommended state regional groups, Western European and other states group at 33.3%, African group at 23.3%, Asian group at 20%, eastern European group at 13.3%, and Group of Latin American & Caribbean States at 10%.

Table 1: Recommending state regional group

Tunisia is a country in Africa of the AL (League of Arab States), AU (African Union)|OIC (Organisation of the Islamic Conference), and OIF (Organisation internationale de la Francophonie) groups. The main themes that were of main concern were women’s rights, access to justice, asylum seekers, death penalty, detention, women’s rights, freedom granting, right to education and torture, and other CID treatment.

The recommended regional groups were; the Western European and other states group at 28.2%, the African group at 28.2%, the Asian group at 20%, the Group of Latin American & Caribbean States at 12.9%, the eastern European group at 10% and observers at 0.6%.

There were various actions being taken, mostly specific action and a greater proportion noted, general action and most responses supported, continuing action and most of the responses supported, and finally considering action where there was equality between noting and supporting.

From the bar graph above a greater proportion of the responses were specific actions where most responses were supported. The next category was general action and also most responses were supported. For continuing action, a greater proportion of the responses were supported whereas all considering action responses were supported.

From the graph, specific action responses were the leading where a greater proportion was supported. All general action responses were supported. The continuing action responses were greatly supported while most of the considering action responses were noted.

About 37.7% of the responses were noted and 62.3% supported. The specific action categories were 47.5%, general action at 27%, continuing action at 22.1%, and the remaining 3.3% considered.

From the table above also, the support response rate was 76.7%, whereas the remaining 23.3% was noted. Specific action responses were 43.3%, general action at 31.7%, continuing action at 21.7% and considering action at 3.3%.

The responses that were supported was 78.2% and those noted at 21.8%. Specific actions were 44.1%, general action at 30%, continuing action at 20.3% and considering action at 5.3%.